Mysterious beast |
While hype for a troubled game is potentially dangerous it can be forgivable if the expectation isn't too high, and I'll admit I myself feel enthusiastic for both this game, Prey 2, and Doom 4, but instead my problem with this hype scene is that it exist in a way that says the game will be incredible even without evidence. Actually there's a lot of evidence pointing to the contrary in the case of Last Guardian. Director left for social games, some other key team members left, the game has been silent for about 4 years, and its console generation has left. It sounds like it would be a mess, but it might still be something cool. Might is the key word, but hype doesn't like to hang out with that term too often, and many are just talking like it is still going to be incredible when/if it releases. I seen the same thing with Last of Us.... which doesn't help my argument necessarily since that was a true hit, but until that happened it was kind of pathetic. I mean we had it teased by basically showing off plants, and knew it was Naughty Dog who was making it, and that was all it took for The Last of Us to cement itself as a legendary game. Why!? Then we heard the concept was yet another post-apocalyptic shooter in a time where people were starting to say they were sick of it... but oh don't worry, its an exception to the rule and the best thing ever even though we don't know squat about its genre, mechanics, characters, or anything important to what makes a game a good game. Hallow teaser, overused cliched boring concept, no gameplay, and people were still hyped it like it was going to invent space travel. If you're excited to see what Naughty Dog has planned next, that's fine and I've got to say I was curious and hanging onto the news as well, but hyping up nonexistent gameplay as the greatest thing ever is just absurd. To this day I can't help but wonder if that colored the views with the game. It was a great achievement on the team's part, but I wonder if people took that good quality and multiplied it just like reviewers do the majority of the time (you know, like when they have a strongly covered game, spam you with its advertisements and hype previews, and then give it an 8-10 without exploring hardly any mechanic to tell you why its so special). Whats probably worst though is that it derailed from the criticism....
In the eyes of many it couldn't do any wrong if it hit a certain quality mark, and from there it just becomes magically perfect to many people... to the point where the blatant lying trailer about AI was forgotten about by most and even in that exact video you have more people worshiping it than you have people demanding ND be held to their own promises. However actually doing that would require thinking about what you're interested in the game for, and that's where it all goes back to square one: if you're literally hyped over nothing, you're not paying attention to what the game means and what it is doing, and from there you can go to some dangerous roads whether through the consumer being let down, a sour fad developing, you tell the industry they can get away with certain things, or again the problem where you don't get people to improve.
Its all okay! They made this |
Last Guardian is made by a company with a great record... so fine, lets hope with confidence that it'll be something interesting. However where else has the game looked promising? Where else have you seen something in the game that facinated you? What caught your attention to the point of child-like excitement? It'll take more than a logo to start dubbing a CGI trailer responsible for the best game that never happened. Its not that I doubt Last Guardian; For all its troubled development I honestly expect it to show up and surprise me one year with interesting gameplay. It has a unique setting and idea, so I hope to one day see its concept in action and see a reason to watch it better. There's got to be a reason Sony's still dumping money into this thing. Still we need to cut the crap out with blindly hyping things that don't exist as games yet. You stand higher potential to hurt the game's ratings, hurt your own expectations, hurt others gullible enough to fall into a contagious hype train trap, and I wouldn't be surprised if you were also enforcing dumb pre-orders in the process (though by then you often have game footage to go by). Truth is you need more than a name, or some pretty CGI E3 trailer to truly know whether or not a game is worth it. These are video games, not movies. See what it plays like. Start to pay attention to what mechanics you want to see, know what stories you want told, and see if a game relates or engages you. That doesn't happen through teasers, flashy over-ambitious E3 showings, or company logos. Once you can seperate the two, you not only know better what to expect, but you can start to get the word out and better judge the game and that even applies way outside of this "blind" hype bit and into just general gaming. For example, imagine if Assassins Creed actually had better combat by now because people said something before going all google eyed over the pirate tag. I guess I'm getting off subject here, but I'd just be repeating myself, much like this mistake of blind hype does. Just stop hyping without a reason guys.
Don't kill it with your anticipation |
No comments:
Post a Comment